In Valid Logic

Endlessly expanding technology

Membership.GeneratePassword and plain alphanumeric passwords

Recently, I ran across an issue with a particular way I was using Membership.GeneratePassword. I had written some code to handle some automated deployment and was using Membership.GeneratePassword to generate a password for a SQL user and then add it to the connectionStrings section of the web.config.

GeneratePassword takes two parameters, one for the length, and one for the number of non-alphanumeric characters (characters other than 0-9, a-z, and A-Z). The way I was using it was GeneratePassword(8, 0), so I wanted an 8 character password with just alphanumeric characters.

However, I eventually ran into an issue with it. It generated a password with ';' in it, which broke the format of the connection string. Even with the way I was specifying 0 for numberOfNonAlphanumericCharacters, it was still inserting a couple of non-alphanumeric characters. After testing, I found it was averaging 2-3 non-alphanumer characters per password. I just didn't notice it until one of them actually broke something.

I dug into the documentation for Membership.GeneratePassword and found for the numberOfNonAlphanumericCharacters, it showed the parameter description as:

The minimum number of punctuation characters in the generated password.

This contrasted what was shown to me in IntelliSense when I was initially coding it.

IntelliSense for Membership.GeneratePassword

So while I specified I didn't want any non-alphanumeric characters, since the parameter is actually just a minimum, there is still a chance for them to slip in.

In examining the code through Reflector, I found that it generates the password in a kind of two-pass method. It first runs through and generates a password of the given length, allowing for a random chance of non-alphanumeric characters to be added. It then makes a small second pass where it ensures the given minimum has been meet. So if it needs additional non-alphanumeric characters, it will randomly replace characters until the minimum is met.

This makes sense, but it poses the problem that the method is not useful for generating simple alphanumeric passwords. In a case like mine, where I intend to use it in a connection string, it has the potential to break the syntax.

In the end, it would be nice if one of two things happened:

  1. Update the IntelliSense documentation to reflect that it is the minimum and not the actual number of characters.
  2. Update the method to treat the parameter as the minimum, but to support just alphanumeric characters when 0 is passed. As it is now, GeneratePassword(8, 0) and GeneratePassword(8, 1) are nearly identical, as the probability of getting a true alphanumeric password is low. With this suggested change, if you don't want non-alphanumeric, then use 0. If you do want non-alphanumeric, then you can just use 1 or more. If you don't care, perhaps they could add an overload for GeneratePassword(length) which maps to allowing a minimum of 1 (to encourage stronger passwords).

For now, I just switched to using my own base 62 random string generator and will make a mental note about the behavior.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

 
blog comments powered by Disqus